Continuous monitoring of colonoscopy performance in the Netherlands: first results of a nationwide registry

Colonoscopy

Case-mix adjustment to compare colonoscopy performance between endoscopy centres: a nationwide registry study

Endoscopy

Nass KJ, van der Vlugt M, Elfrink AKE, van den Brand CL, Wilschut J, Fockens P, Dekker E, Wouters MWJM

doi: 10.1055/a-1637-9651

Colonoscopy

Key performance measures for colonoscopy in the Polish Colonoscopy Screening Program

Endoscopy.

Bugajski M, Rupinski M, Wieszczy P, Pisera M, Regula J, Kaminski MF

doi: 10.1055/a-0956-1889.

Further Publications

Colonoscopy Outcomes in Average-Risk Screening Equivalent Young Adults: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry

Am J Gastroenterol

Butterly LF, Siegel RL, Fedewa S, Robinson CM, Jemal A, Anderson JC

doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000820

Colonoscopy

Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO₂: a randomized controlled trial using a tandem colonoscopy approach

Gastrointest Endosc.

Anderson JC, Kahi CJ, Sullivan A, MacPhail M, Garcia J, Rex DK

doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.046.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Agreement Between Home-Based Measurement of Stool Calprotectin and ELISA Results for Monitoring Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.

Heida A, Knol M, Kobold AM, Bootsman J, Dijkstra G, van Rheenen PF

doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.007.

Gastrointestinal Cancer

Capecitabine Versus Active Monitoring in Stable or Responding Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After 16 Weeks of First-Line Therapy: Results of the Randomized FOCUS4-N Trial

J Clin Oncol

Adams RA, Fisher DJ, Graham J, Seligmann JF, Seymour M, Kaplan R, Yates E, Parmar M, Richman SD, Quirke P, Butler R, Brown E, Collinson F, Falk S, Wasan H, Shiu KK, Middleton G, Samuel L, Wilson RH, Brown LC, Maughan TS, FOCUS4 Trial Investigators.

doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01436

ColonoscopyGastrointestinal Cancer

Variation in Colonoscopy Performance Measures According to Procedure Indication

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.

Mangas-Sanjuan C, Santana E, Cubiella J, Rodríguez-Camacho E, Seoane A, Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, Suárez A, Álvarez-García V, González N, Luè A, Cid-Gomez L, Ponce M, Bujanda L, Portillo I, Pellisé M, Díez-Redondo P, Herráiz M, Ono A, Pizarro Á, Zapater P, Jover R, QUALISCOPIA Study Investigators.

doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.035.

Colonoscopy

Motorized spiral colonoscopy: a first single-center feasibility trial

Endoscopy.

Beyna T, Schneider M, Pullmann D, Gerges C, Kandler J, Neuhaus H

doi: 10.1055/

Colonoscopy

A 3-day low-fibre diet does not improve colonoscopy preparation results compared to a 1-day diet: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial

United European Gastroenterol J.

Taveira F, Areia M, Elvas L, Alves S, Brito D, Saraiva S, Cadime AT

doi: 10.1177/2050640619883176.

Related content

Case-mix adjustment to compare colonoscopy performance between endoscopy centres: a nationwide registry study

Key performance measures for colonoscopy in the Polish Colonoscopy Screening Program

Colonoscopy Outcomes in Average-Risk Screening Equivalent Young Adults: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry

Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO2: a randomized controlled trial using a tandem colonoscopy approach

Agreement Between Home-Based Measurement of Stool Calprotectin and ELISA Results for Monitoring Inflammatory Bowel Disease Activity

Capecitabine Versus Active Monitoring in Stable or Responding Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After 16 Weeks of First-Line Therapy: Results of the Randomized FOCUS4-N Trial

Variation in Colonoscopy Performance Measures According to Procedure Indication

Motorized spiral colonoscopy: a first single-center feasibility trial

A 3-day low-fibre diet does not improve colonoscopy preparation results compared to a 1-day diet: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial

Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total underwater colonoscopy versus standard CO₂: a randomized controlled trial using a tandem colonoscopy approach